Content Tracking System (CTS)

Know how healthy your document repository really is

CTS is an AI-powered health monitor that scores your repository for completeness, compliance, quality and governance, then tells you what to fix first.

New to CTS? Read the Solution Brief: Is Your Repository Ready for AI?

Live CTS dashboard: Repository Health measured on US National Archives open data
Live demo on real public data: US National Archives dashboard · Health report

The Problem

An AI assistant is only as good as the repository supporting it

If you know your repository is poor, you don't trust it. If you don't know how good it is, you can't trust it. An AI assistant trusts it anyway: it treats your repository as the source of truth and delivers poor answers with great confidence.

CTS confirms whether your repository can be trusted, through a health check, and gives you actionable recommendations to improve it where it falls short:

  1. 1

    Measure

    CTS checks your repository against your own KPIs, policies and compliance rules and produces a single Repository Health score.

  2. 2

    Recommend

    Every gap comes with an evidence-based, actionable recommendation, ranked by risk.

  3. 3

    Fix

    If you choose, CTS's AI fixes the smaller problems itself and calls out anything that needs your direct attention.

  4. 4

    Monitor

    CTS keeps watching around the clock, so new problems are caught before they become business issues.

What the score covers

  • Content
  • Structure
  • Metadata
  • Search
  • Data Quality
  • Security
  • Governance
  • AI Readiness
How CTS works

Proof on Real Records

What we found in the US National Archives

We ran a health check on a portion of the public records the US National Archives makes available, and were a little surprised by what we found.

At first glance the catalogue looks healthy: 83.4% Repository Health across 7,896 records. Yet only 37.6% of those records are ready for an AI assistant to answer from. Many have no description or subject terms, and many digitized records have no searchable text. An AI assistant would not notice. It would answer anyway.

CTS health report for a sample of the US National Archives catalogue: 83.4% Repository Health across 7,896 records
Measured on a sample of the public catalogue using AITS preferred KPIs. This effort is not endorsed by the US National Archives.

Solutions and Demos

See CTS at work in other sectors

Every solution comes with a demo you can open now. Two of them run on real public data.

How healthy is your repository?

Answer sixteen statements and see your estimated Repository Health score straight away.